Archive for social development of children

South Africa-Development of Children in Orphanages Part 2

Saturday, August 14th, 2010

A specific way where adaptation to the social environment lacks for children raised in orphanages in South Africa is in the area of language and speech development of their native language or second language.

Development of communication skills is essential 

Communication competence is fundamental in the growth of other significant areas of development and if frustrated can lead to an increase in long term difficulties in behavioural, social, cognitive, psychiatric, and academic competencies.[i] The term communicative competence is described as the process whereby,

 “a normal child acquires knowledge of sentences, not only as grammatical, but also as appropriate. He or she acquires abilities as to when to speak, when not, and as to what to talk about with whom, when, where, and in what manner.”[ii] 

 A reason to suggest this lack of communicative competence is the quality of verbal interactions between the care-givers and the children.  Due to the high care-giver to child ratio, such as 20:1 in some Romanian orphanages,[iii] low general education levels of staff, and minimal training in child care and development, often times verbal interaction and thereby modelling is limited.[iv]   A specific model of responsiveness between communication partners includes:

 Child-oriented responses (i.e. utterances that comment on the children’s plan of the moment), interaction-promoting responses (i.e. utterances that encourage children to engage in extended conversational turns), and language-modelling responses (i.e. utterances that expand or extend the semantic content of the children’s communicative attempts). [v] 

 A study completed in a South African orphanage found that care-giver interactions within these three areas were particularly inadequate.  Partially due to cultural norms, care-givers do not regard children as communicative partners.[vi]  For example care-givers often interrupt adult to adult conversation to regulate child behaviour by saying only the child’s name and with no follow up afterwards; children often take the initiative to communicate either verbally or non-verbally depending on their needs; care-givers often ignore this initiative or respond with only eye contact and very little verbal reply.[vii] As well care-givers do not change their speech pattern to accommodate the child’s developmental level and very rarely speak to infants or young children.[viii]

 A milestone for communicative competence occurs between the ages of 9-12 months and is determined by the development of canonical babbling which are vocalizations such as yells, shrieks and some vowel and consonant-like sounds.[ix] This stage is an important indicator of later speech and language development.[x]  However, in the case of the orphanage in South Africa it was perceived that the children between 9-12 months had neither developed canonical babbling or communicative intent and even those children 12-15 months had not yet developed canonical babbling and very few had limited communicative intent.[xi]  In regards to the importance of development of communication competence in infants, the cultivation of connectedness between care-giver and child necessitates the interrelationship between the child and their “immediate social world and as their communicative competence develops, so too does their ability to connect with the wider social space.” [xii] This lack of verbal modelling on the part of child-care providers in South African orphanages inhibits the communicative abilities of the children being reared in these institutions.


[i] Levine, K. & Haines, S. (2007). Opportunities for the Development of Communicative Competence for Children in an Orphanage in South Africa.  Child Care in Practice, 13 (3), 221-236. doi: 10.1080/13575270701353564

 [ii] Brooks, B. (2001).  An examination of the communicative and linguistic abilities of children adopted from Romanian orphanages. Retrieved from http://dspace.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/1880/41123/1/2001_Brooks.pdf

 [iii] Brooks, B. (2001).  An examination of the communicative and linguistic abilities of children adopted from Romanian orphanages. Retrieved from http://dspace.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/1880/41123/1/2001_Brooks.pdf

 [iv] Levine, K. & Haines, S. (2007). Opportunities for the Development of Communicative Competence for Children in an Orphanage in South Africa.  Child Care in Practice, 13 (3), 221-236. doi: 10.1080/13575270701353564

 [v] Levine, K. & Haines, S. (2007). Opportunities for the Development of Communicative Competence for Children in an Orphanage in South Africa.  Child Care in Practice, 13 (3), 221-236. doi: 10.1080/13575270701353564

 [vi] Levine, K. & Haines, S. (2007). Opportunities for the Development of Communicative Competence for Children in an Orphanage in South Africa.  Child Care in Practice, 13 (3), 221-236. doi: 10.1080/13575270701353564

 [vii] Levine, K. & Haines, S. (2007). Opportunities for the Development of Communicative Competence for Children in an Orphanage in South Africa.  Child Care in Practice, 13 (3), 221-236. doi: 10.1080/13575270701353564

 [viii] Levine, K. & Haines, S. (2007). Opportunities for the Development of Communicative Competence for Children in an Orphanage in South Africa.  Child Care in Practice, 13 (3), 221-236. doi: 10.1080/13575270701353564

 [ix] Levine, K. & Haines, S. (2007). Opportunities for the Development of Communicative Competence for Children in an Orphanage in South Africa.  Child Care in Practice, 13 (3), 221-236. doi: 10.1080/13575270701353564

 [x] Levine, K. & Haines, S. (2007). Opportunities for the Development of Communicative Competence for Children in an Orphanage in South Africa.  Child Care in Practice, 13 (3), 221-236. doi: 10.1080/13575270701353564

 [xi] Levine, K. & Haines, S. (2007). Opportunities for the Development of Communicative Competence for Children in an Orphanage in South Africa.  Child Care in Practice, 13 (3), 221-236. doi: 10.1080/13575270701353564

 [xii] Levine, K. & Haines, S. (2007). Opportunities for the Development of Communicative Competence for Children in an Orphanage in South Africa.  Child Care in Practice, 13 (3), 221-236. doi: 10.1080/13575270701353564

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Categories : African Children
Comments (0)

South Africa – Development of Children in Orphanages

Wednesday, August 11th, 2010

The results of poverty are changing the social fabric of many countries all over the world, especially in third world countries such as South Africa. The family unit (immediate or extended) is no longer capable of supporting the immense number of orphaned and vulnerable children.  Many children and adolescents are being reared instead in institutional settings; mainly government or faith based orphanages.  The orphanage facility does not provide adequate avenues for developmental growth of the children or adolescents being reared; achieving average developmental milestones within these institutions is severely hampered.   There is a lack of development in the areas of social-emotional skills, communication, and cognitive ability.  The effects of living in an orphanage are far reaching and may limit the ability to adapt to a “normal” life once the children become of age to leave the institution.

Attachment is a fundamental and critical process in the social and emotional development of any infant, and affects the future ability of establishing positive relationships.  Attachment is described as the bonding experience between an infant and a parent or caregiver that is based on security, proximity, and safety.[i] This initial bonding experience impacts the infant as they proceed to grow and develop in their ability to create subsequent relationships and to develop coping skills and strategies to navigate the social world,[ii] mainly through the development of a primary trusting relationship.[iii] In the case of children being reared in institutions, secure attachments between child and care-giver is often times neglected for reasons of high child to care-giver ratios as well as limited education and implementation of strategies based on the healthy psychosocial development of the children in care.[iv]

Another factor which affects the social development of children raised in orphanages is the duration of time spent in the institution.  Based on the research the percentage of reoccurring social and emotional issues of children in a Romanian orphanage reveals that the duration of stay within an institution increases the likelihood of maladaptive social behaviours.[v] Likewise in Africa, the longer the child is reared in an institutional setting the ties between themselves and their community begin to weaken.

In Africa, the community is a kind of “extended-extended family.” The close links of families, clans, and communities in sub-Saharan Africa make for an enduring resource.  Compared with children raised in communities, those brought up in institutions are likely to have tenuous cultural, spiritual, and kinship ties with their families, clans, and communities. Kinship ties are especially important in Africa because they form the foundation for people’s sense of connectedness and continuity.  They are the basis upon which are built the social, cultural, “all round life” skills for navigating the complexity of life on the continent.[vi]

Therefore, micro level attachment between a child and a primary care-giver and also macro level attachment between the child and the larger community are all very important links that are necessary for well developed social and emotional skills.  These links for social development can best be explained by Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological systems theory which states that social ties to the immediate as well as the larger community steers a child’s development.[vii]


[i] Buchanan, T. G. (2004). The Impact of Attachment Theory on International Adoption.  Retrieved from http://www3.dbu.edu

[ii] Buchanan, T. G. (2004). The Impact of Attachment Theory on International Adoption.  Retrieved from http://www3.dbu.edu

[iii] Ateah, C.A., Kail, R.V., Cavanaugh, J.C. (2009). Human Development: A Life-Span View.  Toronto, ON: Nelson.

[iv] Groark, C.J., Muhamedrahimov, R.J., Palmov, O.I., Nikiforova, N.V., McCall, R.B. (2005). Improvements in Early Care in Russian Orphanages and their Relationship to Observed Behaviours.  Infant Mental Health Journal, 26 (2), 96-109.

[v] Kadlec, M.B., Cermak, S.A. (2002).  Activity Level, Organization, and Social-Emotional Behaviours in Post-Institutionalized Children.  Adoption Quarterly, 6 (2).  Retrieved from http://sws1.bu.edu/cermak/pdfs/activelevel.pdf

[vi] Foster, G., Levine, C., & Williamson, J. (Eds.).  (2005). A Generation at Risk. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

[vii] Paquette, D. & Ryan, J. (2001).  Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory. Retrieved March 16, 2010 from http://pt3.nl.edu/paquetteryanwebquest.pdf

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Comments (0)